By David S. Webster, emended by Nicholas Klacsanzky

In “Berkeley in the Sixties” (Kitchell 1990), a celluloid approximately e San Francisco Bay region protesters, both on and off campus, during the later Sixties, Postmark Bardacke, a spectacular Berkeley basal, excitedly describes what it was ilk to hitch during those geezerhood. As the cars passed by, he says the adults in the forepart ass would take him with rocklike faces, but the kids in the backrest ass would imperativeness their noses against the bottom windowpane and shape heartsease symbols with their fingers. He exults, “we’ve got the kids on our face, and we can’t recede; we hardly can’t suffer.”

Charles Reich, in The Rejuvenation of America , his long-familiar cri de coeur against the American incarnate country, verbalized the like theme. In 1970, he wrote almost the young finish of the previous Sixties as follows:

Their protestation and insurrection, their refinement, apparel, euphony, drugs, slipway of cerebration, and emancipated life-style are not a passage fad or a cast of resist and refusal, nor are they in any sensation irrational.

The unharmed rising figure, from ideals to campus demonstrations to beads and chime bottoms to the Woodstock Fete, makes gumption and is function of a reproducible ism. It is both requisite and inevitable, and yet, it bequeath admit not sole youthfulness, but all citizenry in America. (4)

From the viewpoint of the mid-1990s, and with sapience provided by hindsight, it is open that Weenie Bardacke and Charles Reich were both deadened wrongfulness. America tod is far more button-down, both politically and socially, than they and millions of early Americans in the belated Sixties would e’er let believed could pass. So, to key the changes in American civilization in the conclusion двадцать пять eld, a punter metaphor than The Rejuvenation of America would be “The Big Chill” (Shamberg 1983).

Therein cinema, various adults who had been finish friends in the Sixties as University of Michigan undergraduates drop the weekend unitedly spell attendance the funeral of one of their college buddies. They breakthrough that about of them get turn more worldly-minded, schematic, and jittery o’er the eld than, cover when they were in college, they e’er dreamed they could.

This examine discusses changes in American order during the one-quarter c around ‚tween the later Sixties and the mid-1990s. It examines 3 kinds of changes: kickoff, trends in college freshmen’s political recognition, values, and attitudes; irregular, the lot of versatile reforms, innovations, and experiments tested on college campuses in the recent Sixties and former Seventies, mostly in reception to bookman protests; and tierce, transformations in American government and guild concluded the end двадцать пять days about.


The demonstrate for college freshmen’s changes in values and attitudes, 1966-93, comes from information self-contained by Alexander W. Astin and his colleagues in the Co-op Institutional Inquiry Syllabus (CIRP). They deal surveys apiece downfall to a taste of first-time, full-time college freshmen at institutions illustration of the nation’s four-year colleges and universities and of biennial colleges that offering comrade of humanities degrees or distinguish themselves as “terminal vocational” (Dey, Astin, and Korn 1991, 131). The surveys are cautiously conducted and analyzed, and they are extremely regarded by higher pedagogy scholars and administrators.

To prove changes in freshmen’s values and attitudes ended the age, we equivalence their responses to selected items either in 1966, the get-go class the appraise was conducted, to their responses to the like or a like, though not monovular, point, in 1993. If the detail was not included in the одна тысяча девятьсот шестьдесят шесть review, we equivalence freshmen’s responses thereto the commencement yr it did seem to their responses in 1993. Their responses appearance that in many shipway, college freshmen’s values and attitudes shifted, ended the age, towards existence more cautious.

The responses reported beneath are selected from a bigger issue of items relating to liberalism and conservativism. Lull, later examining freshmen’s responses complete roughly a one-quarter hundred, [Dey, Astin, and Korn одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто один and “This Year’s Freshmen” 1994], it is crystallize that freshmen’s responses to many, though by no way all, items that can be construed as relating to loose or button-down views establish a shimmy in a button-down guidance. Freshmen’s responses to selected items are sorted below quartet headings, as follows: political designation; physicalism; vexation for law and ordering; and business for serving others.

Political Designation

In 1970, the commencement metre that this detail appeared on the CIRP questionnaire, 37% of all freshmen declared that their nowadays political views were either far unexpended or broad (Dey, Astin, and Korn 1991, 122); in 1993, lone 27% characterized their views intrinsically (“The Year’s Freshmen” 1994, A31). (Since all percentages reported on freshmen values and attitudes in the Sixties and betimes Seventies are from Dey, Astin, and Korn [1991], and all percentages for одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто три are from “This Year’s Freshmen” [1994], from now on, in coverage these percentages, we summon foliate numbers, lone.)


In answer to leash ramify items dealings with values and attitudes, freshmen gave more conservative responses in одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто три than they had earliest. In 1966, 44% powerfully or pretty agreed that beingness selfsame well-to-do financially was either all-important or identical crucial to them (p. 122); by 1993, amply 75% responded that it was (p. A31). In 1971, 50% agreed that a rattling significant rationality in determinant to attend college was to be able-bodied to shuffling more money (p.

Один 12); in 1993, 75% gave this reaction (p. A31). In 1971, 74% indicated that a selfsame significant cause why they distinct to attend college was to be capable to get a meliorate job (p. Один 12); in 1993, 82% gave this as a really significant cause (p.


Business for Law and Fiat

In their responses to items relating to “law and edict,” freshmen loosely changed, terminated the days, to more conservativist views. In 1968, lonesome 19% powerfully or jolly agreed that marihuana should be legalized, but the balance thought so increased to 38% in одна тысяча девятьсот семьдесят and to 39% in 1971, and it stayed at 46% or higher passim the residual of the declination (p. 124); in 1993, lonesome 28% idea that ganja should be legalized (p. A31).

In 1969, 54% idea that thither was overmuch headache in the courts for the rights of criminals (p. 124); in 1993, 68% did (p. A31). In 1969, 54% persuasion that execution should be abolished (p.

124); in 1993, but 22% intellection so (p. A31).

Headache for Portion Others

Freshmen, in their responses to trey dissimilar items, were more implicated with serving others in the previous Sixties and other Seventies than they had been in 1993. In 1966, 69% mentation that it was requisite or selfsame significant to aid others in trouble (p. 122); in 1993, but 64% persuasion so (p. A31).

In 1970, 29% mentation it was crucial or selfsame significant to enter in a community execute platform (p. 122); in 1993, lonesome 26% did. In 1971, 43% intellection it was requirement or rattling authoritative to get byzantine in programs to tidy the surroundings (p. 122); in 1993, alone 29% did (p.



The tardy Sixties were geezerhood of unprecedented pupil protests on college campuses. Piece many of the protests byzantine issues that stretched far bey campus, such as civic rights for blacks, environmental defilement, and the Vietnam War, many former educatee protests in the Sixties and betimes Seventies focussed on campus matters (Astin, Astin, Bayer, and Bisconti 1975, 38^10). The two virtually acerbic and lengthy bookman revolts of the Sixties, the Unblock Language Motion, commencement in одна тысяча девятьсот шестьдесят четыре at the University of California/Berkeley, and the protests, earlier o’er the localisation of a new gym, that began at Columbia University in 1968, both tortuous, at the kickoff, local issues.

In reaction to pupil protests, hundreds of colleges and universities, including many that had not been the scenery of educatee protests, initiated educational reforms, innovations, and experiments in the former Sixties and former Seventies. Now, many or well-nigh of them suffer complete or been precipitously curtailed. We reckon under trey types of reclaim that let been mostly stillborn: fashioning the arts syllabus more “relevant”; fashioning donnish rules, regulations, and requirements more pliable; and allowing students a larger vocalization in campus affairs.

Devising the Humanities Syllabus More “Relevant”

The later Sixties and other Seventies witnessed, in many fields, either the first or a bang-up gain in the routine of “relevant” courses, programs, and majors in the arts curriculum—in such areas, e.g., as lightlessness and versatile over-the-counter kinds of ethnical studies, women’s studies, environmental studies, and eve peacefulness studies. Spell women’s studies courses, programs, and majors let continued to proliferate always since, nearly of the others birth not. Belike a littler balance of American college students contract courses in blacken studies, environmental studies, and the others nowadays than did so in the betimes Seventies.

Two otc attempts of the recent Sixties to micturate the humanities programme more “relevant” sustain since disappeared or virtually disappeared. These are observational colleges and programs, ordinarily placed good traditional colleges and universities (Subsidization and Riesman 1978, 187-188), and teach-ins.

Qualification Donnish Rules, Regulations, and Requirements More Compromising

Many efforts were initiated in the tardy Sixties and betimes Seventies to brand pedantic rules, regulations, and requirements more whippy than they had been. They included the chase: permitting students to return courses nether the fling/no citation selection; rental students fall courses until really belated in the semester; bounteous students donnish quotation for “life experiences” they had had ahead attention college; requiring fewer courses and sequences, peculiarly in disciplines remote the strong-arm and biologic sciences; “sanitized” transcripts, on which no flunk grades were recorded; and “individual” majors, intentional by students.

Allowing Students a Larger Vocalism in Campus Affairs

In the arouse of the scholar protests of the belated Sixties, campuses responded in many slipway to dedicate students a larger part than earlier in campus affairs. These included providing for students to assist, either by election or designation, on respective section or campus-wide committees, to the donnish sen, and sometimes to the institution’s administration card. Occasionally, students eventide got the vote on whether prospective module members should be ordained and flow module members should experience incumbency.

These reforms suffer either terminated or been greatly curtailed at many or nearly of the campuses that introduced them.

Those virtually comrade with American higher training bear loosely agreed that many of the campus reforms of the recent Sixties and betimes Seventies were failures. Gerald Subsidisation and David Riesman wrote in The Incessant Ambition that “what in the Sixties seemed to many idealists (both educatee and staff), as deserving stressful oft appears a 10 around afterwards to be bootless i.e. destructive” (p. 5).

In the like vena, Clark Kerr wrote that in the Sixties and Seventies, American search universities attempted tercet kinds of profound regenerate: “academic reform”; “reconstitution of the university into a organize factor of mixer reform”; and “changes in governing.” He ended that these tercet key changes attempted ended the preceding xx eld had “largely failed” (Kerr 1982, один 80).

AMERICAN Government AND Guild

America is intelligibly more button-down, both politically and socially, in the mid-1990s than it was in the belatedly Sixties. During well-nigh of the Sixties, two large-minded Democrats, Lav F. Kennedy (1961-63) and Lyndon Johnson (1963-69) served as chairwoman. In девятнадцать of the двадцать шесть eld since 1969, Republicans birth been prexy: Richard Nixon (1969-74); Gerald Crossing (1974-77); Ronald Reagan (1981-89); and George Chaparral (1989-93).

Lone from 1977—81, nether Pry Carter, and since 1993, nether Peak Clinton, has America had Popular presidents, and both get been temper, instead than loose Democrats.

The more conservativist mould of American presidents since одна тысяча девятьсот шестьдесят восемь reflects the increasing political conservativism of the land as a unhurt. According to Caplow, Bahr, Modell, and Chadwick, in Late Sociable Tendency s in the Joined States. 1960-1990 (1991):

Pollsters regularly ask Americans how they would post themselves on a liberal-conservative continuum. From одна тысяча девятьсот сорок done about the mid-1960s, the proportions were roughly match, with the cautious slope gaining fairly more backup than the progressive. …Since the mid-1960s, nonetheless, in the populace escaped thither has been a pronounced increment in the proportions identifying themselves as comparatively materialistic, a determination replicated in iv furcate canvass serial. (337-338)

Miscarriage, Illegal Unpaid Drugs, and Executing

On a diversity of populace insurance matters, including miscarriage, the use of cannabis and over-the-counter illegal unpaid drugs, and execution, America has off more materialistic ended the finish stern hundred. One of the major goals of the starter women’s campaign in the previous Sixties and former Seventies was for women to get abortions on necessitate. Its hopes were mostly completed in the Joined States Sovereign Court’s Roe v. Wade decisiveness (1973). In it, the Tribunal held, by the awry ballot of 7-2, that states did not bear the rightfield to limit abortions during the beginning trimester of maternity and that they could determine, but not veto, abortions during the s trimester.

Since that watershed conclusion, nevertheless, the Courtyard has made more one opinion which erodes women’s rights to miscarriage conferred by Roe v. Wade, well-nigh notably Webster v. Missouri Procreative Wellness Services (1989) and Rusty v. Sullivan (1 990).

In the one-time, the Courtyard ruled that “some state-imposed restrictions on miscarriage are constitutionally permissible” (Fix, Jelen, and Wilcox 1992, 3). In the latter

…the Lawcourt ruled that the administrator outgrowth could translate a law forbiddance kinfolk preparation clinics that take federal finances from playacting abortions to too proscribe doctors at those clinics from discussing miscarriage with their patients. The Lawcourt spurned arguments that these administrator interpretations profaned the built-in exemption of address of healthcare providers in these clinics. (Fudge, Jelen, and Wilcox 1992, 197)

Undercutting its Roe v, Wade decisiveness fifty-fifty farther, in одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто три the Courtroom distinct that “federal judges cannot occlusion protesters who try to pulley women’s accession to miscarriage clinics….” (“Abortion Blockades” 1993, A 1).

Many nation legislatures, besides, birth chipped off at the generative rights that Roe v. Wade gave women. From одна тысяча девятьсот семьдесят три to 1989, пятнадцать states passed 9 or more statutes constrictive women’s rights to an miscarriage conferred by Roe v. Wade, and another двенадцать states passed from fin to ogdoad statutes constrictive these rights (Halva-Neubauer 1993, Mesa 10.1, 173).

Partially as the solution of the versatile restrictions on women’s rights to hold an miscarriage that get been located since Roe v. Wade by U.S. Sovereign Romance decisions and nation legislatures, in 1992, according to a sketch interpreted by the Allan Guttmacher Plant, the bit of abortions performed in the Joined States dropped to around 1.53 1000000. That was the last-place number recorded since одна тысяча девятьсот семьдесят девять (“U.S.

Miscarriage Rate” 1994).

Americans sustain get more button-down, ended the geezerhood, in their use of marihuana and over-the-counter mostly illegal amateur drugs, likewise. In the previous Sixties, as the use of marihuana and early illegal unpaid drugs increased crisply among immature citizenry, many Americans opinion that earlier really farsighted, cannabis and perchance another outlaw drugs would be legalized passim America. In the San Francisco Bay country, it was wide rumored at the meter that a major butt maker had obtained a stylemark on the idiom, “Acapulco Amber,” and plotted to use it as the brand for its demarcation of marihuana cigarettes when cannabis became sound.

Finally, xi states legalized the monomania of belittled quantities of ganja ( Thies and Cross-file 1993, 385). The turn of masses victimization ganja rosebush steady from the mid-1960s until it reached a vizor in some 1980; still, abaft that period, the use of unlawful drugs declined steady until almost 1991. Therein yr, the University of Michigan’s Found for Societal Inquiry reported as follows:

…over the conclusion ten eld, thither let been appreciable declines in the use of a bit of the unlawful drugs among [highschool] seniors, and level bigger declines in their use among American college students and offspring adults mostly (accent theirs).

(Johnston, O’Malley, and Bachman 1991, 12)

The authors of “Recent Mixer Trends in the Joined States. 1960-1990” institute that with the elision of users of cocain, whose numbers had more two-fold since 1980, and diacetylmorphine users, whose numbers had remained unaltered since 1980:

Lento, identical easy, the intake of mood-changing substances seems to be declining in the Joined States. Since 1980, the habitue use of marihuana, stimulants, tranquilizers, sedatives, barbiturates, hallucinogens, intoxicant, and baccy has declined, especially among untested adults. (Caplow, Bahr, Modell, and Chadwick 1991,512)

The use of outlaw drugs, from some одна тысяча девятьсот восемьдесят to approximately 1991, declined not sole among younker but among all age groups, as the chase passageway shows:

A serial of family surveys undertaken by the Internal Establish on Habit at intervals from one to ternary eld betwixt одна тысяча девятьсот семьдесят один and одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто один demonstrates that, for all age groups, habit seedy about одна тысяча девятьсот семьдесят девять and has been declining always since. In fact, betwixt одна тысяча девятьсот восемьдесят пять and 1991, the figure of stream dose users among Americans senior двенадцать and o’er (compulsive by those surveyed who acknowledged victimization an illegitimate dose leastwise formerly inside the conclusion 30 years) declined by one-half. (Hanson 1991, 151-152)

Thither is prove that the use of cannabis, afterward declining steady for more a ten, started to ascending in одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто два among one-eighth graders and highschool students (“Teen-Age Smoking” 1994, 1), and too among college students (“Students’ Dose Use” 1993). Notwithstanding, Americans of all ages’ use of outlaw, unpaid drugs clay practically frown in the mid-1990s than it was in 1980, and far frown than a gravid many Americans, during the belatedly Sixties, would let predicted it would be tod.

In executing, too, America has swung, during the by two decades around, to a more conservativist office. As with miscarriage, on which the U.S. Sovereign Tribunal issued a watershed tolerant decisiveness in the former Seventies that has since been scoured both by subsequent Judicature decisions and country legislatures, the like has happened with executing. In 1972, the U.S.

Sovereign Tribunal ruled that the execution, as it was so apportioned, was unconstitutional, on the curtilage that it was not applied uniformly and was not express to specifically-named crimes. By 1976, sufficiency states had rewritten their laws to destine the item crimes for which the executing would be imposed that the Sovereign Romance reinstated the execution, adieu as it was not the mandate penalty for any law-breaking. From 1977, when the offset rung of executions was held, to July, 1994, around двести сорок пять prisoners were executed ( Gest 1994, 31).

Protesters of the Tardy Sixties

Nowhere can “The Big Chill” in American companionship be seen more vividly than in the late activities of approximately of America’s well-nigh salient rebels and protesters of the later Sixties. Many of them bear sour to surprising new pursuits. E.g., Jerry Rubin, who on with cofounders of the Blackness Puma Company, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Tom Hayden, and others, was one of the illustrious Chicago 7 conspirators on tribulation in 1969-70, as of одна тысяча девятьсот восемьдесят девять had “renounced radicalism to turn a Paries Street merchandising manager and now a Manhattan club promoter” (Kunen 1989, 107). Bobby Seale, for his parting, has authored a cookbook, “Barbecue’n with Bobby” (“Then and Now” 1993). H. Rap Chocolate-brown, quondam leader of the Educatee Unbloody Coordinative Commission, has get a reverend; he is now known as Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, header of the Atlanta, Georgia Community Mosque (“Then and Now” 1993).

Jane Fonda, wide known as Hanoi Jane during the later Sixties for her backup during the Vietnam War of Northwards Vietnam, is now marital to Ted Turner, proprietor of Turner Broadcasting Organization, and one of the xxx some richest mass in America (“The Forbes Four-spot Hundred” 1993, 124- 125). She produces best-selling drill videos and was rated the first heroine of untested Americans in a одна тысяча девятьсот восемьдесят пять U.S. Word & Man Account Rope-maker pollard and the quarter well-nigh admired charwoman in America in a Ladies Abode Daybook Ropemaker canvass the like class ( Who’s Who in America одна тысяча девятьсот девяносто три , 1130).

David Horowitz and Shaft Pitman, San Francisco Bay are radicals of the tardy Sixties and former Seventies and editors of the leftwing clip, Ramparts , during the like flow, suffer both stirred from far Leftfield to far Redress. Around of their many left-bashing articles and speeches sustain been poised in their Destructive Propagation: Indorsement Thoughts roughly the ’60s (Pitman and Horowitz 1989) and Deconstructing the Odd: From Vietnam to the Persian Disconnect (Pitman and Horowitz 1991). Approximately political icons of the belated Sixties comeback civilization late posed for an advertising edubirdi review of Ben & Jerry’s icecream yet , as Newsweek frigidly ascertained in an clause highborn, “The Big Chill” (Nayyar 1994).

Bobby Seale is visualised clasping a pint of vanilla icecream around his spunk; Daniel Berrigan, the stem priest who was confined in the betimes Seventies for his acts opponent the war in Vietnam, is shown, eyes closed seeming adam, belongings aloft a heaping bag of mocha hedge (“Introducing Ben & Jerry’s” 1994).

Well the nigh democratic American vocalist of the Sixties sideboard cultivation was Bob Dylan, who wrote of the changes wholesale concluded America in such songs as “Blowin’ in the Wind” (1962), “The Multiplication They are A-Changin”’ (1963), “Maggie’s Produce,” (1965), and “The Lay of a Slim Man” (1965), with its famed chorus, “…something is occurrent hither, but you don’t recognise what it is, do you, Mr. Jones?” Since the Sixties, he has continued to write songs, piddle records, and circuit, but his medicine has undergone roughly staggering changes, the virtually far-famed of which was the solution of his changeover to Christianity. In 1978, Dylan “accepted Jesus” (Shelton 1986, 483), and in 1980, he asked a curate to advance the route with him and his circle, “to leash in supplicant and Bible work and to pastor to him personally” (Shelton 1986, 486).

In the former Seventies and former Eighties, he composed and sang blatantly fundamentalistic Christian songs. During this stop, he was oft booed, together appearances, by his erstwhile fans. Shortly fiat, he recorded 3 albums containing songs with Christian fundamentalistic themes: “Slow Gearing Coming” (1979); “Saved” (1980); and “Shot of Love” (1981).

In the former Nineties, he is aforementioned to birth off to orthodox Judaism and to get intensely studied the Talmud. In 1994, Dylan evening went so as to let the organisation Big Six account fast, Coopers & Lybrand, use “The Multiplication They Are A-Changin’,” sung by Richie Havens, in a video advertizement (“Just in Case” 1994).

Last, as if to keep the trueness of Karl Marx’s reworking of Hegel’s noted watching to the burden that “all heavy world-historic facts… seem, so to address, double. …the get-go sentence as disaster, the endorsement sentence as farce” (Bartlett 1992, 481), Timothy Leary, who oft base himself on the awry face of the law in the Sixties for victimization LSD, was latterly arrested at the Austin, Texas aerodrome for the misdemeanor of smoke a cigaret (“’60s Guru Arrested” 1994).


As of the previous Sixties, millions of Americans, both untried and old, hoped for and level expected that ahead really hanker, America would undergo what one strain of the sentence called “the morning of the age of Aquarius”—an age when, i.e. everyone randy, off in, and dropped out, silence many of the ideals of the juvenility counterculture of the Sixties would rule. Rather, the reverse has happened—both the campus and American companionship as a unhurt get turn more conservativist, politically and socially, than virtually masses could perhaps get foreseen a quartern c ago. The nation’s campuses, the view of so many rebellions in the previous Sixties, suffer been without a major objection in more xx eld.

America has been led, for more двадцать пять age, not by tolerant Popular presidents, but by Republicans and moderationist Democrats. The multiplication sustain, so, changed, but not in the way that Bob Dylan’s call, “The Multiplication They are A-Changin’,” predicted.


“Abortion Blockades Get Homage Security.” Tulsa Humanity . Четырнадцать January 1993, Al, A3.

Astin, Alexander W., Helen S. Astin, Alan E. Bayer, and Ann S. Bisconti. The Index of Resist . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

Bartlett, Lav. Comrade Quotations . Sixteenth ed. Boston: Fiddling, Dark-brown, 1992.

Caplow, Theodore, Howard M. Bahr, Lavatory Modell, and Bruce A. Chadwick. Late Sociable Trends in the Joined States . 1960- 1990. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Pressure, 1991.

Pitman, Pecker and David Horowitz. Deconstructing the Leftfield: From Vietnam to the Persian Disconnection . Lanham, Md. Endorsement Thoughts Books and Core for the Discipline of Pop Civilisation, 1992.

Deconstruct ve Genesis: Arcsecond Thoughts some the ’60s . New York: Top Books, 1989.

Prepare, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. Betwixt Two Absolutes: Opinion and the Government of Miscarriage . Bowlder, Co: Westview Wardrobe, 1992.

Dey, Eric L., Alexander W. Astin, and William S. Korn, the American Fledgling: 25 Twelvemonth Trends . 1966-1990. Los Angeles: UCLA, Higher Breeding Explore Establish, 1991.

Fonda, Jane. Ingress on her in Who’s Who in America , vol. 1, Forty-eight ed.

New Providence, NJ: Marquess Who’s Who, 1993, 1130.

Gest, Ted. “Crime’s Preconception Trouble.” U.S. Intelligence & Earth Composition . Двадцать пять July 1994, 31-32.

Subsidisation, Gerald and David Riesman. The Incessant Daydream . Chicago: University of Chicago Pressing, 1978.

Halva-Neubauer, Glen A. “The States later Roe: No ‘Paper Tigers.”‘ In Malcolm L. Goggin (ed.)

Reason the New Government of Miscarriage . Newbury Parkland, Ca: Sage-green, 1993, 167-189.

Hanson, F. Allan. Examination Examination: Sociable Consequences of the Examined Animation . Berkeley: University of California Jam, 1993.

“Introducing Ben & Jerry’s Polish, No Chunks.” Clip . Тридцать May 1994, 14.

Johnston, Lloyd D., Patrick M. O’Malley, and Gerald G. Bachman. Dose Use among American High Seniors. College Students and Offspring Adults.

1975-1990 . vol. 2, “College Students and Offspring Adults.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Section of Wellness and Buzz Services, 1991.

“Just in Showcase You Hadn’t Heard—the ’60s Are Complete.” Clip . Тридцать один January 1994, 23. Kerr, Clark. The Uses of the University.

3rd ed. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Jam, 1982.

Kitchell, Score. (Manufacturer and conductor). “Berkeley in the 1960s.” Berkeley: Kitchell Films, 1990.

Kunen, James S. “A Tumultuous Renegade Chooses a Unsounded Last.” Masses . Один May 1989, 100-102, 107, 108, 110.

Nayyar, Seema. “The Big Quiver.” Newsweek . Двадцать три May 1994, 51.

Reich, Charles A. The Rejuvenation of America . New York: Random Theater, 1970.

Shamberg, Michael (Manufacturer) and Lawrence Kasdan (Conductor). “The Big Shiver.” Culver Metropolis, Ca: Columbia Pictures, 1983.

Shelton, Robert. No Guidance Domicile: The Biography and Medicine of Bob Dylan . New York: William Morrow, 1986.

“60s Guru Arrested on Baccy Tutelage.” Tulsa Humanity . Двенадцать May 1994, 14.

“Students’ Dose Use Rises Astern Becalm Declination.” Account of Higher Teaching . Двадцать один July 1993, A5.

“Teen-Age Smoke, Dose Use are Increasing Again.” Stillwater NewsPress . Тридцать один January 1994, 1, 3.

“The Forbes Cd.” Forbes . Восемнадцать October 1993, один 10-313, with many pages skipped in ‚tween.

“Then and Now: Revisiting the Radicals.” Newsweek . Двадцать семь September 1993, 60.

Thies, Clifford F. and Charles A. Record. “Decriminalization of Cannabis and the Necessitate for Inebriant, Marihuana and Cocain.” Mixer Skill Diary тридцать (no. Четыре 1993): 385-399.

“This Year’s Freshmen: A Statistical Visibility.” Account of Higher Instruction . Двадцать шесть January 1994, A30-A31.

“U.S. Miscarriage Grade Last-place Since 79, Researchers Account.” Tulsa Humankind . Шестнадцать June 1994, 2.

enquiry wallpaper roughly government , inquiry theme initialize , search composition types